Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Essays > Horror > Science Fiction > Action > Chase > Sexploitation > Exploitation > Blaxploitation > Grindhouses, Drive-ins & The American New Wave Of Filmmaking

Grindhouses, Drive-ins & The American New Wave Of Filmmaking

 

 

How great has film and filmmaking been in the U.S. since the early days of sound?  Long before cineplexes, home video, cable and PCs existed, single-screen movie theaters were all over the country.  Even after the big-name movie studios lost their movie chains in a 1948 Supreme Court decision, the single-screen houses (and often palaces) moved on while drive-ins really kicked in.  It was the post-WWII baby boom era, after all.

 

With TV, the theaters installed multiple speakers for stereo and even multi-channel sound, as well as making their screens wider to accommodate many new wide formats.  TV eventually overtook many of these places when color TV arrived, but great gimmicks and showmanship were a response.  When the studios themselves started to loose touch with the audience, along with many TV stations needing as much new product as many independent movie theaters, the demand for interesting B-movie product soared and some great films resulted.

 

It has been a surprise that the Robert Rodriguez/Quentin Tarantino double feature film Grindhouse did not do the potential business it very much deserved initially, it surprised those who especially know how dead-on they were in recreating the fun and ambitious (if explicit) entertainment that new filmmaking freedom and love of film made possible.  Lead by American New Wave architects like Stanley Kubrick, John Cassavetes, Arthur Penn, Martin Scorsese, Brian De Palma and so many others who broke ground, a new heart and soul that those who know and love films stand by to this day.

 

There are some people who did not even know Grindhouse was a double feature, a problem not just from the advertising not emphasizing that enough, but that audiences have put up with second-best for so long that the idea that you would get two films for one price seems like a lie.  No one in the industry has wanted to admit to that one.

 

Also, that films could be violent simply and to the point without wallowing in it (ironically called “cheap” as if torture, turning the screws and suffering is some kind of fun luxury like a cell phone) suddenly seems innovative.  It speaks volumes about how violence has been overly processed like digital video effects to the point where a monster being “that guy in a mask” offers whole new joys of film viewing.

 

The theaters that did not get closed down but usually did not have the dollars available to keep them in Grade-A shape became the places that played the B-movies.  Some where actually nice places that had cash to put into their place, then specialized in a mix of B-movie and counterculture fare.  For those who thought the movie Grindhouse was yet another Horror film, they missed the boat and it is one worth getting reservations on.

 

Drive-ins were still alive and well in the 1970s, so they fit it those films in with their second-run (and even first-run) of studio product as did more than a few regular theaters, making moviegoing in the 1970s actually exciting.  How often can you say that about films now?

 

Like the cheap HD productions of today, most of the product filmed then was not always great and many were investors just trying to get a quick buck, but most of them look ambitious and skillful as compared to the cycle of post-Blair Witch HD hacks we are suffering through now.

 

Also, these productions had more originality, energy, ambition, forced the makers to think and create more because the producers of these films knew real competition was out there.  Now, it is about formulaic marketing and people who think they are something when they are no-talent hacks ruining the industry and filmmaking itself; smarmy idiots who have no idea what good films are.  The great irony of Grindhouse is that two of the top filmmakers (Rodriguez seems to be one of the only human beings alive who knows how to make HD look good) in the business going out of their way not to try to be the next Kubrick or Spielberg, love films, are themselves and make two remarkable B-films that humiliate and annihilate just about every genre production since the 1970s it celebrates so loudly and proudly.

 

That is why Grindhouse is as special as it is fun.  When you get the history and get the jokes, all the way to the purposely missing lost reels, scratches on the prints (indie producers and distributors could only afford so many prints even then when film was cheaper, and the majors were only making so many prints because cineplexes were not around en masse yet) and other flaws really are part of the experience.

 

That is why it is not to be missed in a theater where everyone can enjoy it with a real audience.

 

 

For more on the film, we have a theatrical review and we’ll be looking at more versions down the line:

 

http://www.fulvuedrive-in.com/review/5244/Grindhouse

 

 

-   Nicholas Sheffo


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com