Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Essays > Video Tecnology > Performance > DVDs > How dark is too dark? – DVD Video Playback (Kolchak '74 as example/Updated)

How dark is too dark? – DVD Video Playback (Updated)

 

 

NOTE:  This was written before the advent of Blu-ray, so the debate may seem moot, but the debate still continues into Blu-ray and over the Kolchak: The Night Stalker box set in particular.  We recently covered a new edition from Australia, which you can read about below with link included.

 

 

We have had some interesting conversations, debates, and reviews seen on this, other websites and even print publications about Video Black.  It has been a “holy grail” in home video only equaled by Video White and surpassed by that hardest of all video colors, Red.  Even the best digital High Definition still (even updating this article 4.5 years later) cannot do Red as well as the best film stocks and especially the best film color processes (three-strip Technicolor, three-strip Tru-Color, the result of shooting in large frame formats, even 16mm and sometimes Super 8mm color film).  But we will stick to Black for this essay.  The debate came up again when reviews came in for MGM’s reissue of the Horror double feature The Night Stalker/The Night Strangler.  Our review is as follows:

 

http://www.fulvuedrive-in.com/review/1379/Night+Stalker/Night+Strangler+(MGM/rem

 

 

Video Watchdog Magazine just recently caught up with that DVD and though the second film was a bit darker than the first and the previous copy from the out of print Anchor Bay version of the two films several years ago.  Then, Universal released the sequel TV series Kolchak: The Night Stalker (1974 – 1975) and our review offered:

 

http://www.fulvuedrive-in.com/review/2888/Kolchak:+The+Night+Stalker+(1974-75+se

 

 

The color was good and better than I felt many people were giving it credit for.  Some thought it was awful, while others were thrilled the show was out in such good copies.  I thought it played well for an older TV show, with the darkness not bothering me as much.  As a huge fan, it was ironic it bothered so many others.  Now comes a Region 4 PAL DVD import set of the series which has better color and is a bit clearer, even at the expense of detail, as this review will show:

 

http://www.fulvuedrive-in.com/review/9520/Kolchak:+The+Night+Stalker+-+The+Com

 

 

Those complaining about the U.S. edition might want to get it, though there is also a U.K. version (cover image now included with this essay) that we have not covered, but may be closer to the new Australian set from reviews we have seen.

 

 

Getting back to our previous points: unlike the telefilms, each episode had different qualities, and some were dark.  Sometimes, this was because the show was shot darkly on purpose and at night, but with variances within episodes of the picture quality, it is hard to say any one show was consistent.  One reviewer suggested the scenes of the monsters were being darkened because the creature make-up and costumes might look lame or silly and the show has some monster appearances that show some age (i.e., their werewolf (in a great combination of Scooby Doo and counterculture mode), a landed flying saucer in They Have Been, They Are, They Will Be, Richard Kiel looking too much like Richard Kiel (and known so internationally as “Jaws” from the James Bond films) as The Diablero in Bad Medicine, the headless biker in Chopper or reptilian killer in The Sentry) that one can fess up to.  Another critic said he had the old Columbia House VHS tapes and could see some more detail in the tapes versus such darker scenes, but that is nominal as compared to the Australian version and detail at what price?

 

Even those who saw darkness could not agree.  Some said it was all the prints.  Others said it was the monster sequences.  Some said it was many scenes, but we said it was only on occasion.  Even with THX and other video standards, Video Black is a funny thing.  Some people simply cannot handle something being too dark, while others may simply have their TV calibrated improperly.  In a day and age of a disturbing majority of film and TV productions going for the degraded digital look and having all of its color desaturated, mutilated or gutted out, Video Black offers unexplored new territory.  This “gray ghetto” has skewed the issue, made worse by those who cannot distinguish from origin al black and white stocks (Classic Hollywood) with silver content and then cheaper, more commercial, grayish version we have now.  Even when the prints have been a bit dark, TV movies or series, all the Darren McGavin Night Stalker productions were shot exceptionally well and the series especially was shot often at night versus the nearly obsolete day-for-night shooting.  Note that none of the complaints were about the look of the first telefilm, the only one to have any day-for-night work.

 

Yes, some of the master materials form the Universal set might be late analog-compatible composite D2 digital tapes, but they are NOT the same exact masters as the VHS releases.  Though we skipped reviewing the VHS releases for obvious reasons, the later prints in order of how the series ran were not as color rich as earlier shows, something the DVDs have corrected nicely.  The sharpness improvements and range of color blow the VHS out of the water, so any overly dark shots are a minor setback in comparison to the tapes.  And most importantly, the MPEG-2 video compression on all DVDs has notoriously had a Video Black problem, which is why we address it in so many of our reviews.  When Disney (who owns the telefilms which they licensed to Sony/MGM) and Universal redo the shows for digital High Definition in a few years, these differences will be more obvious.  Though the DVDs in both cases are not perfect, they remain some of the best looking and sounding classic TV on DVD to date.  Video Black is therefore a more complex issue in the DVD format and with Blu-Ray and even HD-DVD arriving next year, their higher resolution will reveal just how much of an issue this always was with DVD and it is one of the reasons why so many titles have had to be reissued.  It is also one of the reasons the studios were not immediately behind DVD in the first place, until it proved itself in the marketplace.  So in any case, next time you read a review (other than this site, of course) where someone complains about the picture being too dark, take it with a grain of salt.  Otherwise, you might miss out on some great programming on DVD.

 

Yours thoughts on the matter are encouraged.  You can write us on what you think about this subject.  We’ll see about catching the third set ASAP as we hope for a Blu-ray edition in the near future.

 

 

[This was the site’s home page letter beginning in October 2005 and going into November, updated February 2010.]


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com