Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Reviews > Drama > Cinema > Political > Erotic > The Dreamers - Original Uncut NC-17 Version

The Dreamers (2003) – Original Uncut NC-17 Version

 

Picture: B     Sound: B     Extras: B+     Film: B-

 

 

How does a film lover, cinephile, movie buff or whatever you want to call them negotiate the problems of Bernardo Bertolucci’s adaptation of The Dreamers?

 

On one hand, there hasn’t been a film made in recent memory that is such an unabashed love letter to classic cinema.  From recreations of scenes from Freaks and Bande à part among many others and clips of films like City Lights, Scarface (the original 1932 version), Blonde Venus, Top Hat, À bout de souffle and Shock Corridor (again, among many others) to the events that frame the narrative (and, indeed, the characters themselves), The Dreamers lives, dies, breathes and makes love at 24 frames per second, in glorious black and white, sometimes with subtitles and, now and then, in glorious CinemaScope.

 

But the other hand is another story all together.  The narrative is flimsy, the characters unsympathetic and, at times, repugnant, and the very things that make the film so interesting in the first place are used so often to an ever-lessening effect that you become angry that something so beautiful has been tainted by overexposure.

 

After a vivacious opening credit sequence, we’re introduced to American Matthew (Michael Pitt), an exchange student in Paris in 1968.  He lives in a seedy, dingy hotel (so bad that he has to pee in his sink — because the only toilet is a communal one?).  To occupy his time between his studies, he goes with great regularity to the Cinemateque Français to watch everything and anything.  When Matthew goes to the cinema, he says, he sits as close as possible to receive the images first, before they’re dirtied by the rows of theater seats and eyes of other filmgoers.  He goes to the Cinemateque so often, in fact, that he claims to be part of a film buff group; though he has no friends and watches movies alone, making his claim a dubious one at best.

 

One day in May, 1968, the French government shuts down the Cinemateque because they think that it and its owner, Henri Langolis, are contributing to the rebellious, revolutionary tone in the country.  Naturally, the cinephiles who call the Cinemateque home are outraged; none so much as Isabelle (Eva Green), who chains herself up to the gates of the theater in an act of defiance, and her twin brother Theo (Louis Garrel).  It’s on the day of the closing that Matthew, Isabelle and Theo meet.  Matthew’s intrigued by Isabelle’s beauty, Theo’s interested in Matthew’s interest in Nicolas Ray films and they all share a common love of the motion picture.  And, after a brief getting-to-know-you phase, Matthew is invited to stay with the twins when their parents go on holiday.

 

Up until this point, the tone of the film has been such that the story that is being set-up is a coming-of-age one set against extraordinary events happening on the streets below.  The look of the film is beautiful, the dialogue is sharp if not pretentious and the movie-love hasn’t yet crossed over into obsession.  The events portrayed as the backdrop of the film are interesting, but not yet fully formed.  There is great possibility with all the pieces that have been presented.

 

Unfortunately, Bertolucci can’t keep this tenor going, although he certainly has fun trying.

 

What follows after Matthew moves in with Isabelle and Theo isn’t a barrage of sex that the film’s NC-17 rating suggests, but it’s not far off.  There is a copious amount of nudity, a couple full on “junk shots,” one of Pitt’s and the other of Green’s.  And there is sex, but it’s unstimulating to the point of boredom.  There are a couple of gratuitous moments that involve blood and Isabelle (use your imagination and you’re sure to figure one of the moments out) that are totally, grossly unnecessary.

 

But the problem isn’t the sex; it’s what is lost at its expense.

 

Prior to this, Bertolucci was recreating scenes from famous French and American films as a way of getting us as excited about the lives of these three people as they are.  And these scenes are fabulous.  When Isabelle, Theo and Matthew run through the Louver in an attempt to break the “record” set by the characters in Bande à part, Bertolucci recreates the shots from the older film to match perfectly in his.  It’s beautiful.  And when the twins chant, “He is one of us” in a nod to Freaks, and Bertolucci cuts to scenes from that film, it’s the perfect cherry on top of his cinema sundae.

 

Bertolucci also has an idea to have the larger events of worker strikes and uprisings and a move towards Maoist thought happening on the streets of Paris play a larger role in the film, as well.  But like with the scenes from old movies he recreates, the social events are lost in the shuffle of showing these three kids grow more and more uninteresting.

 

This is a pity.  We shouldn’t feel bored by the characters at the center of the story, but by the film’s end—a massive riot involving police, Molotov candles and broken friendships—we don’t care what happens to Isabelle and Theo when they charge after the police or where Matthew goes when he walks away from his friends and their “revolution.”  For 100 minutes of the film’s 115-minute running time, none of the characters care about the workers’ strikes or any of that.  They’re just angry that the Cinemateque closed.  So when they climax comes and they’re all of a sudden filled with a sense of social responsibility, it comes off faked and, worse, forced.

 

There is a beauty and ambition in The Dreamers that isn’t fond in many other films.  Unfortunately, it’s not sustained.  The film is, ultimately, very frustrating because it could have been about something.  Instead, it’s about… oh, forget it.  Let’s just talk movies and fool around.  That’s all fine and good, but there’s an expectation set up at the onset of the film and it’s never fulfilled.

 

The Dreamers comes released on two DVDs: the original uncut NC-17 version reviewed here, and a slightly shorter R-rated version.

 

The NC-17 cut looks pristine, and the sound is full and lush. It’s a dialogue heavy film, so there isn’t a lot of stuff happening aurally.  But when riots and the like occur and there are more opportunities for sound effects, the disc delivers.  This is a disc that benefits from its anamorphically enhanced 2.35 X 1 transfer, while the Dolby Digital 5.1 is smoother than usual, though too bad it was not in DTS.

 

The extras are plenty on this NC-17 DVD.  Besides a commentary with Bertolucci, writer Gilbert Adair and producer Jeremy Thomas, there is a making-of documentary, titled appropriately enough “Bertolucci Makes The Dreamers,” a featurette on the events used as the backdrop for the film, “Outside the Window: Events in France, May, 1968,” a music video for Michael Pitt’s cover of the Jimi Hendrix classic “Hey Joe,” and trailers for The Dreamers and Garden State, reviewed elsewhere on this site.  The complement of extras are worthwhile, but they bring to light some of the things that were missing from the film and make you wish that much more that the film itself would have been that much better.

 

The Dreamers was a film that was well received upon initial theatrical release, and it’s not hard to see why.  It indulges in something everyone who goes to the movies to see a movie like The Dreamers indulges in: cinema history, lore and trivia.  But even though it appeals to the vanity of so many film fans, that doesn’t excuse its shortcomings: style over substance — hell, everything over substance — and sloppy narrative, among many others.

 

Twentieth Century Fox should be commended, first, for releasing the film theatrically as an NC-17 product rather than caving into MPAA pressures like so many other studios have in the past five or six years.  And they should be thanked for releasing a quality DVD for a film that, while well received, went pretty much unseen.

 

The Dreamers is a flawed masterpiece that, thanks to its DVD presentation, can be viewed as such in its original form.

 

 

-   Dante A. Ciampaglia


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com