Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Reviews > Drama > Wuthering Heights (1992)

Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights (1992)

 

Picture: B-     Sound: B-     Extras: D     Film: B-

 

 

Every time a film adaptation of Emily Bronte’s classic Wuthering Heights is made into a feature film, the result is always fascinating.  It does not even need to be successful, though, because it seems like every time people assemble to shoot this classic, their love for it trips them up in odd ways.

 

William Wyler’s classic version in 1939 still tends to be definitive of at least the first part of the book.  Then you have the great Luis Bunuel doing his take in 1953, who is an even more personal director, known for his controversy in sex and politics.  The under-appreciated British director Robert Fuest came up with his own distinct version in 1970, known for his work in Horror-genre films and TV series like The Avengers.  That leaves us with this 1992 version, directed by Peter Kosminsky, which is competent, but has some strange twists of its own.

 

Though its director is the least known of them all, his approach is to do the most naturalistic version yet.  No Classical Hollywood style, no personal vision (surrendered with the pretense of including the author’s actual name in the title,) no quirky approach, and nothing much else to rise above the material as written in the screenplay adaptation by Anne Devlin.

 

The legendary story about a doomed love is here, written by a woman, but directed by a man.  That causes problems, especially with at least the male looking for dark undertones in the story.  Obviously, the book was also written by a woman, but one of another time.  These three forces, though not totally clashing, do cause a flattening of the work which does not help the film.  Juliette Binoche plays two roles, but this was the wrong film to do that in, with these problems and other issues of distinction.  Ralph Fiennes is Heathcliff to her Cathy, but the dual role on her part ruins the chemistry they have, more eerie by playing Cathy’s daughter!

 

I like the darkness Fiennes brings to the film, but Binoche is sold short, as is too much of this version.  It is also less British than the Fuest version, feeling “ethnically cleansed” by comparison.  Fortunately, it is not as bad as a secondary-cast British TV production, but it dips into that zone often enough.  Being shot on film really helps it from more visits to that level by being forced to shoot for a big screen on film.

 

The anamorphically enhanced 1.85 X 1 image shows more grain than expected for its age, and is likely a late analog transfer.  The color is subtle throughout and cinematographer Mike Southon, B.S.C., creates a nice feel for the film, which is matched by its locations and production design.  This is not the most spectacular this film could have looked, but it is not bad either.  The Dolby Digital 5.1 AC-3 remix is of the theatrical Dolby SR (Spectral Recording) that this mix shows sounded pretty good for its time.  SR always was the best optical analog sound reproduction in the business, and is available in a somewhat compressed Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo with Pro Logic surrounds.  In both cases, the music sounds a bit too stressed, as does the rest of the sound.   As a result, the nice score by Ryuichi Sakamoto does not get the chance it deserves to be heard well.  Also, there are no extras whatsoever, even a trailer.

 

In another strange twist, Bronte herself narrates and shows up in the film, played by Sinead O’Connor, of all people.  O’Connor did not yet find herself embroiled in self-destructive controversy (read more about this in the review of her DTS concert DVD Thank You… under her name, elsewhere on this site,) but after watching the Telefilm The Brontes of Haworth (also reviewed on this site,) it is yet another odd choice.  All added up, this could have become a camp classic if a few more things had gone wrong.  However, it is an interesting failure that only adds to the controversy of what is right and wrong in making a book into a feature film.

 

 

-   Nicholas Sheffo


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com