Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Reviews > Drama > We're No Angels (1989)

We’re No Angels (1989)

 

Picture: B-     Sound: B     Extras: D     Film: C

 

 

With a combination like writer David Mamet, director Neil Jordan, and co-stars Robert De Niro and Sean Penn, a remake of the 1955 Michael Curtiz film We’re No Angels seemed like a sure thing.  Done as an event picture, the film did not fare well in the holiday box-office of 1989.  Why?  Because it just does not seem to know what it wants to do or even what it is doing.

 

It has been many years since last seeing the film and what seemed like glossy star power then is less so now.  Whether it is a harbinger of things to come, De Niro has found himself doing too many more commercial films beneath his talent (far worse than this), Penn has allowed his image to become too politicized in the last few years, though both have still done more serious work as well.  Here, they escape a prison and in order to stay out, become priests.

 

Their facial expressions throughout are not sufficient enough to make them or this film funny.  While the original film sported Humphrey Bogart, Aldo Ray, Peter Ustinov, Joan Bennett, Basil Rathbone and Leo G. Carroll.  That is a top rate cast.  Here, this film tries to match it with Hoyt Axton, Bruno Kirby, Ray McAnally, James Russo, Wallace Shawn, John C. Reilly, and Demi Moore as “the girl”.  That’s not bad, if not as good as the original, so even the supporting cast was not a big problem.

 

It feels more like one of Mamet’s odd independent films, which also does not fit, so in summary, this is one of the most misstep-filled remakes ever made.  It is not that it is a horrible disaster.  In that department, it could never compete against The Avengers, Lost in Space, Psycho or Planet of the Apes, it just never becomes involving on any level.  It is like watching a slow-motion train wreck or a film made of outtakes.

 

As for Jordan, his commercial films never seem to click, even when they are hits, as Interview with the Vampire (1994).  He is better, as are all involved (save Demi Moore), with the more mature and serious filmmaking.  In Jordan’s case, just compare to Michael Collins.  The film even tries to have a serious ending, which further demonstrates all the mixed directions it went in.  Even producer Art Linson is top rate, but some projects are better off left unmade and both the poor critical and poor commercial response the film got bares this out.

 

The anamorphically enhanced 2.35 X 1 image comes from the original, real Panavision images from cinematographer Philippe Rousselot, but the transfer looks like it is the same analog aka (composite digital) video master used for the old 12” LaserDisc release.  The lack of fine detail and color range is the result.  Even the original film looked better, shot in the larger-frame VistaVision format.  As for the sound, two Dolby Digital mixes are provided.  One is a new and slightly better 5.1 AC-3 mix, while the 2.0 mix is similar to the Dolby A-type theatrical sound with Pro Logic-type surrounds.  There are absolutely no extras, not even a trailer.

 

The other odd thing is how everyone quickly rebounded after the film.  De Niro got on a role with Goodfellas, Awakenings, Guilty By Suspicion and even Backdraft.  Penn did one of the best films he ever made in Phil Joanou’s State of Grace, then quit acting for a few years, no doubt bored by this film on some level.  Even Demi Moore found a temporary lapse of success in the megahit Ghost the following year before lapsing back into worse filmmaking.  The supporting cast and others behind the camera also fared better.  This version of We’re No Angels will always seem like one of the oddest anomalies and that is really the only reason to see it.

 

 

-   Nicholas Sheffo


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com