Fulvue Drive-In.com
Current Reviews
In Stores Soon
 
In Stores Now
 
DVD Reviews, SACD Reviews Essays Interviews Contact Us Meet the Staff
An Explanation of Our Rating System Search  
Category:    Home > Reviews > Drama > The Pornographer (2000)

The Pornographer

 

Picture: C+     Sound: B-     Extras: C+     Film: B-

 

 

Is there still a real XXX sex business as there was, or has it been overrun by amateur tape making?  Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie Nights (1997) supposes that the industry collapsed somewhat as VHS and Beta took over from 35mm film and imploded the industry as we knew it.  Yet, there still is a Billion-Dollar sexploitation industry on tape and now DVD alone.  Though not offering more about the transition, writer, producer and director Doug Atchison picks up in latter days of tape-only in The Pornographer (2000), which offers a shy lawyer’s entry into the business.

 

That lawyer (Michael DeGood) enjoys such “productions” and also has a major problem relating to women.  He likes girls, but does not know how to relate or talk to them.  Instead of making a healthy transition into relationships, he decides to take an ill-conceived step into trying to produce his own sex tapes with “more of a story”.  His loneliness is sad, then gets twisted as a sexploitation producer (Craig Wasson) starts to influence his attitude into one of manipulating women.

 

One particular girl he thinks is special is Kate (Katherine Cain), an authentic down-to-earth, southern gal who has the usual problems and no more boyfriend.  She is very sexy without trying, so should this “innocence” be spoiled for profit if she can be manipulated, or should she be left alone as is?  An old-school female sex pro is moving behind the camera and wants other action to start he own company, which could either mean more money or a dead end.

 

The story and set-up are better than expected, as most films on the subject are a disaster, but this film still eventually falls short, because story conventions limit the many intriguing issues the film brings up.  At one point, I was reminded of John Travolta in Brian De Palma’s incredible Blow Out (1981), where al the men have dark reasons for exploiting the women, who have no idea the gravity of the situation.  Though only doing the film sound, Travolta’s character is doing sexed-up Horror film cheapies.  There is no mysterious murder here, but for what is here, the cast is generally convincing, even when the story does not.

 

The full frame image was shot on film, but this transfer is a bit soft, though cinematographer Christopher Mosio avoids many clichés of the business the film covers and the silly semi-nude camera reveals that have become a part of bad filmmaking since.  The Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo has Pro Logic surrounds form the original Ultra Stereo theatrical analog sound, which is not bad, but not as clear as it could be.  Extras include the trailer, three versions of a scene to show its development, the trailer, and a commentary that involves all of the principals that is not bad.

 

DeGood should be given credit for keeping his character ambiguous and naïve, so we never love him or hate him, but the film also feels non-committal in what it is trying to say and to avoid saying.  Some of the art film press thought is was interesting, and they were right, but The Pornographer ultimately fails because it simply does not know how to go all the way.

 

 

-   Nicholas Sheffo


Marketplace


 
 Copyright © MMIII through MMX fulvuedrive-in.com